pearl_chevalier: (neutral)
Akoya Gero ([personal profile] pearl_chevalier) wrote in [community profile] cosmoooc 2015-05-25 04:04 am (UTC)

Minimise the reductions. Even if you want to commit mass genocide, you need to be picky. Evolution cannot result in revolution, or you're going to go an negative downspiral. First acquire statistics- those without special skills, diseases that are hazardous without counteractive alleles all need to go. If you want flaws, go to the people who can maintain it.

Then make sure the environment is suitable for growth. I see how wasteland appeals to you but if you don't have a suitable flow of genes and variation, your species will not be able to sustain itself. A strong species is one that can go through anything.

Am I supposed to go on with just the evolutionary details or also go into the behavioural conquest ones?

[He's clearly put a lot of thought...]

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org